Recently I wrote about the lessons we’re learning from our first K12 pilots this semester.
Our biggest challenge thus far has been adapting Ponder, which was originally designed around self-directed reading scenarios, to assigned reading.
Whereas a really active self-directed article might provoke a dozen or so responses…assigned reading can generate 1-200 responses from a class of 20 students.
This can easily overwhelm both the feed and the article page itself. In my last post I wrote about how we’re starting to ameliorate the issues in the feed.
We’ve also recently shipped a change to the browser add-on to provide teachers and students with a forest (as opposed to the trees) view of student responses.
Those of you using Ponder might have noticed that our Sentiment tags in the Ponder response box are color coded.
We’re now using those colors on the article page itself, so you can see at a glance, where students are responding emotionally, where they’re having comprehension issues and where they’re exercising judgement.
Yellow are responses having to do with basic comprehension or incomprehension as the case may be of the reading:
What does this mean? I’d like examples. I need a break down.
Green are responses that pass judgement through evaluation:
This is hyperbole, oversimplification, insight!
Red are responses that express some kind of emotional reaction:
Disapproval, regret, admiration.
The tick marks are on the right give you a sense of the activity level across the entire reading, be it a one-page article or a 100-page essay.
It’s a small step, but it’s the kind of thing we want to do more of to help teachers get a quick sense of how the class responded as a whole to the reading.